martedì 15 agosto 2017

Best Actress in a Supporting Role 1992: Vanessa Redgrave in Howards End

Vanessa Redgrave received her sixth Oscar nomination for her performance as Ruth Wilcox in Howards End.


Howards End is a magnificent movie revolving around three families belonging to three different social classes at the beginning of the 20th century. First off, I think this picture is an absolute masterpiece of writing, with brilliantly clever dialogue and carefully layered characters. It's such a stunning depiction of that specific time of history while feeling so utterly fresh and contemporary as well. The portrayal of the differences between social classes and the hypocrisy of the ruling class never becomes heavy-handed or one-sided, but it's treated in a human, sensitive fashion that creates at least an understanding even to the most morally questionable characters. The score is absolutely enchanting and it enhances the atmosphere of poetic beauty that surrounds the film and the cinematography is wonderful. And there is not a single bad performance in the cast, though I feel Helena Bonham Carter deserves a special mention for her career-best work here. 

Ruth Wilcox is a challenging role for many reasons. On one hand, it's technically quite limited as it appears on screen only for a handful of scenes at the beginning of the movie and it serves mostly as a setup for the rest of the story. On the other hand, the whole plot relies heavily on her character and the ability of the actress to give believability and emotional weight to the character's final decision on her deathbed, which not only sets the action to motion but is also a representation of the movie's themes and ideas. Thankfully the actress in question is far from being a random one, but it's Vanessa Redgrave, who is in my opinion one of the most intelligent, versatile and gifted performers to ever grace the screen. Redgrave is one of those exceptional actresses that can make calculated acting look spontaneous. Every performance of hers feels precisely and accurately studied and it's always quite apparent that behind her performances there has been a careful preparation, but at the same time she never feels too technical, rehearsed or unsincere: she's one of those very unique actresses that can be both cerebral and emotional in their approach, both technical and raw. And this has rarely been more visible than in her performance in Howards End: there are definite mannerisms in both her physical work and her vocalization, yet it's one of the most delicate and hearfelt pieces of acting I have ever seen.

When we meet Ruth, it's already clear that she's seriously ill and that she is not going to live much longer. Redgrave is outstanding in her depiction of her character's physical condition: she has such a remarkable way of conveying the character's weakness through her body and she really gives you the impression that this woman is aching every step of the way. But what's most incredible is her voice work which is easy to take for granted but is actually quite an achievement: first off, her eloquent, refined way of speaking effectively establishes Ruth's background as a very wealthy, educated woman; moreover, her breathless delivery feels just right for a woman who is in such a painful state though she carefully never overdoes it either; at the same time though there is a spark in her voice that betrays the life-loving, radiant soul that lies beneath Ruth's tired, weak-willed appearence. Redgrave's understanding of the character is so deep that she manages to portray in her performance both the lively person that she used to be and the dying woman whose hunger for life has not waned. Redgrave's performance is short but she's so brilliant I felt like I had always known Ruth Wilcox.

Two things are requested from Redgrave to accomplish in this movie: the first one is to convey during her brief screen-time Ruth's infinite love for her house, Howards End, and the second one is to portray Ruth's affection for her burgeoise friend Margaret (Emma Thompson in an Oscar-winning performance), therefore bringing believability to her eventual choice to leave Howards End to her, even though she belongs to a lower class than hers. And Redgrave does both things astonishingly. Just take her very first scene in the movie, in which she is simply walking around Howards End: Redgrave's worldess acting in this scene is absolutely first-rate - she doesn't need any dialogue to convey the character's affection for the aforementioned place. She walks as if she were trying to capture every single moment she spends there forever into her memory. In later scenes, whenever the name Howards End pops up, Redgrave's face just lightens up, her voice filled with nostalgic fondness and her eyes sparkling with emotion. My favorite scene of her whole performance might be the one in which she tells Margaret of the myth of the pig's teeth at Howards End - it's such a beautifully understated moment that Redgrave plays with such a heartfelt delicacy it becomes one of the most poignant moments in he movie. And when she begs Margaret to come to see Howards End her performance turns absolutely heartbreaking - her delivery of "Come with now, now, come with me now" is absolutely devastating as it is so hopeful and enthusiastic in spite of Ruth's rapidly declining health.

Ruth's friendship with Margaret Schlegel is also one of the movie's most touching aspects as it is on one hand so unlikely and on the other hand so beautiful. Ruth and Margaret are two extremely different people: Ruth is an old-fashioned aristocratic (at one point she remarks that she doesn't think women should vote) while Margaret is a liberal thinker from the middle class. But they're both very kind-hearted and ultimately their bond overcomes their social differences. Both actresses are absolutely wonderful at portraying the friendship between the two characters - they share a lovely, poignant and sincere chemistry and create this beautiful, meaningful relationship that is the emotional crux of the movie in spite of Redgrave's very limited time on screen. Each of their interactions are absolutely heartwarmin to watch, especially the scene in which they go Christmas shopping together. You never doubt the emotional honesty of Ruth's and Margaret's affection for each other and when Ruth decides to leave Howards End to Margaret and not to her family it feels just the right and obvious outcome because of the deep connection that developed between the two. Redgrave's final scenes at the hospital are very low-key but Redgrave is absolutely wonderful in them as she brings so much grace and dignity to Ruth right up to her very final moment.

I know not everyone is impressed by this performance but personally I think it's an absolutely astonishing turn from one of the greatest actress ever. Ruth Wilcox could have been a mere plot device but Vanessa Redgrave creates a three-dimensional individual that becomes the movie's emotional crux. An elegant, subtle, delicate and heartbreaking portrayal that keeps haunting the movie even long after she has left.

5/5

15 commenti:

  1. Ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast?

    I remember liking this movie when i saw it a couple of years ago, but now thanks to your review I'd like to see it again.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. The fact that my review made you want to rewatch the movie is perhaps the biggest compliment you could give me <3 I would suggest you to rewatch the movie, it's amazing.

      Hopkins - 3.5 (I thought the movie was pretty much dominated by the three main female performances and I felt all of the male players felt somewhat overshadowed. This is true for Hopkins as well as I did feel he was a tad overshadowed by Thompson but nonetheless he gives a very solid performance. I like how he does portray a genuine love in his interactions to Thompson while also effectively portraying his character as blinded by his own privilege which makes incapable of empathy for Helen and the Basts. He properly portrays his character as self-forgiving and otherwise unforgiving. I also really liked his final breakdown to which Hopkins brought just the right amount of emotional weight. He's bordering on a 4 for me)

      Carter - 5 (Loved her performance and she easily should've been nominated. Carter is terrific as Helen as she brings so much energy and charm to the role without ever appearing forced: she is such a naturally engaging and compelling presence in the movie and brings a raw ferocity to it that effectively contrasts to the more poised performances from the other players. Carter is great at portraying her character's outrage caused by Henry's indifference to the plight of the Basts which he himself caused and nails all of her aggressive outbursts without ever feeling like showboating. She also does a fantastic job at portraying Helen's transition into maturity as she becomes progressively more reflective and less temperamental without betraying her own ideas. Her performance in the final act is very effective as it plays on a much subtler note than the rest of her performance and Carter is heartbreaking in her depiction of her character's dignity even while facing the complex situation she's in)

      West - 3.5 (Wholly solid performance from him and he certainly makes you empathize with Samuel's plight while never appearing to be actively asking for the audience's sympathy. It's an effective
      enough performance as West always keeps alive the dignity of the character who, in spite of his situation, refuses to beg for help. It's a touching performance and his demise is certainly quite effective even if I never felt he truly became anything all that great and I felt he was overshadowed by Carter in their scenes together)

      Duffett - 3.5 (Very effective at portraying her character's lack of refinement without ever turning her into a joke and is moving in her portrayal of her character's desperation. She delivers in the scene in which more about her character's past is revealed and really my only issue with her performance is the fact that she's not given a real closure)

      I thought James Wilby, Jemma Redgrave, Joseph Bennett and Susie Lindeman all did a fine job at portraying their characters' viciousness while not feeling repetitive but actually showing the despicable nature of their characters in rather different fashions.

      Elimina
    2. I'm going to rewatch it later tonight, the first time I watched it i gave Thompson a 5, Redgrave a 4,5 and Carter a 3,5 since i was not that interested by her carachter; maybe my opinion will change after a rewatch :)

      As soon as you can could you post your top 50 favourites movies? I know maybe 50 is too much but i'm really interested in your opinion.

      Elimina
    3. I might have forgotten something:

      1. Tokyo Story
      2. Gone with the Wind
      3. The Best Years of Our Lives
      4. Brief Encounter
      5. Paris, Texas
      6. A Streetcar Named Desire
      7. Anatomy of a Murder
      8. Chinatown
      9. Manhattan
      10. Blade Runner
      11. Magnolia
      12. City Lights
      13. Badlands
      14. All About Eve
      15. Rashomon
      16. Goodfellas
      17. Singing in the Rain
      18. Blue Velvet
      19. Carol
      20. Dog Day Afternoon
      21. Casablanca
      22. Touch of Evil
      23. The Last Picture Show
      24. To Kill a Mockingbird
      25. The Fly
      26. Taxi Driver
      27. Modern Times
      28. Double Indemnity
      29. Breakfast at Tiffany’s
      30. On the Waterfront
      31. Ballad of a Soldier
      32. Shadow of a Doubt
      33. Fargo
      34. Inglorious Basterds
      35. The Godfather
      36. Almost Famous
      37. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
      38. They Shoot Horses, Don’t They?
      39. Late Spring
      40. Dogville
      41. Seven
      42. Mommy
      43. Wild Strawberries
      44. Rear Window
      45. Moonlight
      46. Nashville
      47. Le Samourai
      48. Floating Weeds
      49. Mad Max: Fury Road
      50. L.A. Confidential

      Elimina
    4. I haven't seen none of your top 4; I'm glad to see Streetcar and All About Eve so high, both of them would be in my top 10.

      Elimina
    5. Streetcar and All About Eve are quite simply masterpieces.

      Elimina
    6. It's great to see someone around these parts having Manhattan in the top ten. Awesome list man! To think I still haven't seen an Ozu film...

      Elimina
  2. Wow seems loved her more more than I did, I have her a 4.5 mostly because she was overshadowed by Thompson.By the way have you seen Single White Female, if you did what are your thoughts and ratings on the cast? I think Jennifer Jason Leigh should have been nominated for her terrifying work in this category.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. I did not feel she was overshadowed by Thompson but I'm glad you still really liked her and gave her a 4.5. There are quite a few people who don't care much for her work here.

      I've yet to see Single White Female but I definitely will before I finish this year, as I'm a great admirer of Jennifer Jason Leigh. She's a brilliant actress.

      Elimina
  3. Certainly in my top 5 in this category. I would have a hard time thinking of a actress that could do what she did with this little character. It was just transcendental. She's absolutely amazing in every way.

    Thank you for this brilliant review.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. GM: What would be your 1992 leading and supporting actress top 5?

      Elimina
    2. I'm glad we agree on her performance. It's so delicate and poignant, I absolutely loved it. And thank you very much!

      Elimina
  4. Well i hope there is still a chance that my predictions are right :D (1 Tomei, 2 Richardson, 3 Davis, 4 Redgrave, 5 Plowright) There is a good chance taht first 3 also get 5 cause Tomei and Davis are love it/hate it win/performance, and Richardson is always at least very good (very underrated!!!) and her performance in Damage is said to be one of her career best and usually on the list of who should have won in 1992 (beside Judy Davis) so we will see ;)

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. We'll see :) and Richardson is certainly an underrated actress. Loved her in The Crying Game.

      Elimina
    2. Me too, to bad it came out the same year as Damage, cause she would have been likely nominated for that in any other year. Although i do think that the fact that she was in The Crying Game, won a Golden Globe(although its a shocking/a bit silly win) for Enchanted April and got nominated in the end for Damage(and won BAFTA for that as well), i guess she was a pretty serious contender for the win. Plus she unlike others that year had an ultra dramatic, baity scene that Academy usually goes for. (in fact i think all 5 ladies were strong contender for the win, although i think Redgrave and Plowright ended up 5th and 4th in the race, and with Tomei winning i would say Judy and Richardson were the runners-up.

      Elimina