giovedì 14 dicembre 2017

Best Actress in a Supporting Role 1940: Marjorie Rambeau in Primrose Path

Marjorie Rambeau received her first Oscar nomination for her performance as Mamie Adams in Primrose Path.


Primrose Path is a very flawed movie a girl whose relationship with a young man is jeopardized by her poor background and her troubled family. I applaud the movie for trying to deal with themes like prostitution back in 1940, but due to the restrictions of the Hays Code the movie is often forced to gloss over the real hardship of the featured characters and, in order to still arouse an emotional response, it opts for melodrama instead. The result is a rather problematic picture whose impact ends up being very muted despite its noble intentions. Even the central love story does not work and that's entirely due to the screenplay, which is in fact quite awful: it often feels hard to truly root for the two characters to end up together and that's because the writing occasionally makes Ginger Rogers' character's actions quite unbelievable and Joel McCrea's one's quite unsympathetic (if not downright cruel). The development of their relationship is never convincing and that's a shame because they have enough of a natural chemistry and they both give perfectly solid, committed performances. 

Marjorie Rambeau plays Mamie, the mother of the film's leading character, Ellie May. It's not a performance that is frequently talked about (nor is the movie) and she's in many ways the forgotten nominee of the 1940 line-up as both Darwell and Anderson have a legendary reputation and also O'Neil (for reasons unknown to me) and to a lesser extent Hussey have their share of fans. Having heard almost nothing about her performance here, I went into it with little expectations and I was pleasantly surprised. Considering the nature of the role (an aging prostitute who has to support her whole family) I was not expecting to see such a laidback performance: throughout most of her performance, especially in the beginning, Rambeau is an incredibly feisty and cheerful presence and the movie's main source of warmth. Though her approach might seem a little odd at first, it ultimately makes sense as Rambeau portrays Mamie as a woman who has long accepted her profession and who does not have much hope for her future but decides to still enjoy the little things she can. There is a touching veil of melancholy in her performance, a hint of regret for how her life turned out that Rambeau manages to convey in brief looks and micro-espressions at just the right time: nonetheless, there is no bitterness in her performance and Rambeau turns Mamie into an heartwarming and tender presence whenever she pops up - and considering how dull most of the movie is, the amount of spontaneous life and energy she brings to the screen is more than welcome.

What won me over especially was how rich and textured is Rambeau's work in spite of her limited time on screen. Though there are not many scenes devoted to her character, Rambeau gives such a vivid and lived-in portrayal that you just feel like you truly know this woman: she manages to convey her character's history and background without the need for it to be addressed directly, she never falls for the opportunity of over-acting (and there were many, especially as far as the accent is concerned) and trascends the stereotype or even joke that the character could have been. She realistically portrays Mamie's lack of both education and refinement without ever looking down on the character and without ever allowing the viewer to do so. She is great in her scenes with Miles Mander, who plays Homer, Mamie's alcoholic, depressed husband: Mander's performance is not without problems but Rambeau excels at conveying the history between the two characters. Right from the start, she shows that Mamie does not love Homer (in a later scene, she explicitly admits that she always respected him for his education more than loved him) but still cares for him a lot and she is quite affecting at subtly expressing Mamie's concern behind her warm and patient behavior. Her best scenes are probably the ones with Ginger Rogers: the two actresses share a terrific chemistry that makes the relationship between Mamie and Ellie May the highlight of the movie rather easily. Rambeau is especially wonderful in the scene on the porch in which Mamie urges her daughter to go after the man she loves, something Mamie did not do in her youth and forever regretted: she is sincerely heartbreaking at showing how Mamie wants a better life for her daughter - even if this life means being away from her.

Another excellent scene for Rambeau comes later on in the movie when Ellie May introduces her husband Ed to the family: there's an especially brilliant moment in which Ed tells her he had seen her already - for a moment, Mamie's face freezes as she thinks he has found out about her profession and then returns to her welcoming, cheerful self when Ellie comes up with a good excuse. It's a pitch-perfect moment acted to perfection by Rambeau. As Ed starts to find out progressively about what truly goes on in the household, Rambeau is very moving as she portrays Mamie's attempts to keep everything from falling apart and her struggle not to ruin her daughter's chance at happiness. The only scene in her performance that does not quite work completely is her final scene which has not aged very well: with her breathless deliveries and slightly overdone facial expressions, her acting style feels a bit dated here but nonetheless she manages to find some moving moments in it and even if the scene itself might not be great it still manages to be quite touching. And after she's gone, her presence is certainly missed greatly.

This is a very good performance from Marjorie Rambeau who makes Mamie by far the most memorable thing about the movie which is an admirable but ultimately unsuccessful effort. For the most part, she effectively avoids going from melodrama and makes Mamie a realistic, three-dimensional human being that adds a lot to the film whenever she shows up. It's an unjustly forgotten nominee, and a remarkable, moving performance.

4/5

16 commenti:

  1. Does she have a lot of screentime in this or not?

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Not too much but she still quite a bit. Around twenty minutes overall.

      Elimina
  2. She is the only nominee I had heard nothing about. Would you say the movie is worth checking out?
    Also, ratings and thoughts on the rest of the cast.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Eh... I wouldn't really recommend the movie but I'd say it's interesting to watch to see how the Hays Code profoundly affected the productions of the era. As a movie it's not quite a must see, but I wouldn't tell you to avoid it either. Rambeau is certainly a worthy nominee.

      Rogers - 3.5 (She is quite miscast as a tomboy which makes her early scenes not totally convincing. She improves later on even though I'd say her work is still hindered by the terrible screenplay that gives her some borderline ridiculous scenes she can't quite save. That said, her chemistry with McCrea is more than decent, she's great in her scenes with Rambeau and she delivers in all of her more dramatic moments later on)

      McCrea - 3 (His character is just a pretty awful love interest and as it is written Ed sometimes comes across as a very mean-spirited person. This hinders his work quite a lot as it makes him not a very likeable lead and makes the love story hard to care about. That said, McCrea does his best to save the role and whenever the screenplay doesn't bog him down he is actually quite charming)

      Mander - 2.5 (Very underused and the movie never seems to decide if he is a tragic character or somewhat of a comedic relief, not to mention that it doesn't even bother to resolve its storyline. Mander is himself a bit uneven as there are moments in which he overacts slightly and others in which he manages to be quite affecting)

      Travers - 3 (Very limited role, but he makes for a very endearing presence as it is often the case)

      Vassar - 4 (I would say her performance is hindered by the film's attempts at making her a somewhat comedic presence in certain parts, which is just unfitting as the role is anything but. For most of the time I actually really liked Vassar's performance as I thought she gave a realistic portrayal of her character's self-involved desperation and is not afraid to make the grandmother a despicable human being. I thought she was very effective in her portrayal of her character's selfishness and lack of empathy towards others and I would have liked to see how her performance would have been if the movie allowed her to go even darker in the role)

      Carroll - 2.5 (It's not a truly awful child performance as I didn't mind having her on-screen all that much, but that said I never felt she left an impact either and I did found her pretty grating at times)

      Elimina
  3. I found this performance quite adequate but not great,it's a 3 for me.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. I was surprised by how much she impressed me. I found it a nice, moving performance.

      Elimina
    2. Questo commento è stato eliminato dall'autore.

      Elimina
    3. Glad you liked her,maybe part of the reason I didn't like her as much is that I kept thinking of other actresses that could have done this role so much better
      (Ethel Barrymore,Thelma Ritter and Anne Revere) and I was rather disappointed because I didn't feel the emotional connection to this character as I do to other similar Roles.

      Elimina
    4. I think Barrymore would have been a bit too old for the role and I’m not a fan of Revere in general so I don’t think I would have liked her very much in the role. As for Ritter, I’d say she would have been a little miscast as an aging prostitute but good overall.

      Elimina
  4. I thought she was very good too. A shame the movie hinders her (and everyone else)

    RispondiElimina
  5. I need to see this movie, and a lot more from 1940. I read in Louis Blog that you saw The Killing of a Sacred Deer, i saw it too yesterday and i really disliked it. Can i have your thoughts on it and the cast?

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. I should say that my opinion of The Killing of a Sacred Deer is probably subject to change but for the time being I thought it was a terrific movie. Lanthimos' claustrophic direction with the aid of Bakatakis's brilliant cinematography, clearly influenced by some of Kubrick's movies, make it a deeply unsettling and disturbing experience and I love how the story takes its time, building up brilliantly to the final act which is pretty much a nightmare. I loved the screenplay, though I can perfectly see why someone would find it problematic: the dialogue are completely unnatural and unrealistic but I think it works at making the experience all the more uncomfortable to watch, something enhanced by the deadpan approach adopted by the whole cast. I could see why someone would not stand the film's distinctive style, but I found it a chilling, terrifying picture which makes the viewer feel just as clueless and powerless as its characters. I also think that beyond the story itself there could be some interesting interpretations of the movie. I thought the movie could be read as a deconstrution of the perfect, middle-class family and lifestyle, though my guess is as good as anyone.

      Farrell - 4.5 (He handles the tricky dialogue perfectly as he manages to be extremely captivating even though his performance is intentionally aseptic and monotonous in his line-deliveries. He manages not to betray the style imposed by Lanthimos while still making us invested in his character's actions and I thought he managed to portray his character's growing distress and desperation over the whole situation impeccably and when his character finally snaps I found his performance to be rather chilling)

      Kidman - 4.5 (Equally great work as I thought her performance suited perfectly Lanthimos' style while still managing to evoke an emotional reation from the viewer. Her deadpan approach ends up being quite brilliant: in the beginning, her stillness is functional at making Anna feel like an embodiement of the somewhat "perfect wife" but then as the story progresses that same stillness is what makes her so quietly devastating as it makes her gradual loss of faith in her husband almost striking in its brutality. It's a very challenging role and Kidman succeeds at bringing nuance to the technically one-note style imposed by the direction. A haunting performance that could grow on me)

      Keoghan - 4.5 (Again the style of his performance is technically one-note and so is his character but I found Keoghan to be absolutely terrific. He makes Martin a purposefully off-putting presence though he manages to give a certain development that some actors could have missed: at the very beginning it just makes his character weird to at moments in a way that is almost endearing, and then as the movie progresses he grows more and more disturbing until being downright terrifying. It's an enigmatic, fascinating and scary performance but what I particularly appreciate is his portrayal of Martin's grief that motives his dreadful actions)

      Cassidy - 3 (She acquits herself pretty well in the role and handles well the deadpan style though I never felt she became quite as compelling as the other players)

      Suljic - 2.5 (Same as Cassidy though he gets even less to do)

      Camp - 2.5 (I thought he was perfectly fine but never all that impressive and he was completely overshadowed by Kidman in their pivotal scene together)

      Silverston - 3.5 (I actually really liked her cameo as I felt she was very impressive in her portrayal of her character's desperation in a way that is both darkly comical and deeply disturbing)

      Elimina
    2. I really enjoyed Farrell too, as i enjoyed him in The Lobster. But i was really disappointed with Kidman, many compared her performance to Birth and Eyes Wide Shut and i can't understand why; i found her character one-note and her wooden delivery didn't really work for me. Of course she has a couple of great scenes, like the confrontation with Camp or the scenes with Keoghan. But overall i was a bit disappointed with her performance, which i still rate 3/3,5, and the movie itself.

      Elimina
    3. I think the comparison between her work in TKOAS and Eyes Wide Shut makes sense as the style of the former occasionally resembles the style of the latter and there some similarities in the performances for me though they are totally different characters. And I think the comparison with Birth works too as in this too there are some silent moments in which it’s all about subtle emoting and acting entirely with the eyes. I really liked her though I understand why you might not have.

      Elimina
  6. Giuseppe: When will the next review be up.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. I’ll try to post it as soon as possible. I have to see a lot of movies from 1940 as I had previously seen only a few (which were all in need of a rewatch) so that’s why I’m taking so long.

      Elimina