sabato 4 febbraio 2017

Best Actor in a Supporting Role: Michael Shannon in Nocturnal Animals

Michael Shannon received his second Oscar nomination for his performance as Detective Bobby Andes in Nocturnal Animals.


Nocturnal Animals is a very problematic movie about a wealthy art gallery owner who grows increasingly paranoid about her ex-husband's novel, a gory thriller that she interprets as an allegory for their marriage. The first time I saw the movie, I actually liked it a lot; then my admiration gradually started to cool down until I finally gave the movie a rewatch which pretty much destroyed it for me. The half of the movie involving Amy Adams' character looks splendid - the production design is gorgeous and the cinematography looks stunning, but in terms of substance it is completely empty, with the few moments of satire being totally out of the place and most of the supporting characters being one-note cartoons (Laura Linney has a moment or two in her single scene, but otherwise she is terrible). I'll give credit to Adams who still manages to pull off a believable and even moving performance despite having an extremely passive character to work with, and she convincingly portrays Susan's transition from naive, idealistic student to embittered ice queen. The half of the move depicting the book's plot is slightly better: I still love Aaron Taylor-Johnson' chilling portrayal and I thought the first scene was impeccably done; otherwise, it's a fairly standard crime story that never becomes particularly compelling - it's not necessarily bad, but nothing special either. The worst element of the movie is probably the screenplay, with often badly written and unrealistic dialogues.

Michael Shannon plays Bobby Andes, a character of the novel who is the detective working on the case involving the rape and murder of Laura and India, respectively the wife and daughter of Tony (Jake Gyllenhaal). The supporting roles in this half of the movie are not very well-written: it seems like Tom Ford wanted them to be some sort of heavily stylized figures, something not unlike the supporting characters of David Lynch's Wild at Heart. Unfortunately Nocturnal Animals is not Wild at Heart or anything like David Lynch's movies as Ford doesn't really set a definite atmosphere in this movie and that's why it feels mostly atonal. The novel side of the movie in this regard feels particularly odd as there are both straightforward performances (Gyllenhaal) and very stylized ones with the overall register being just sort of flat. Bobby Andes is one of those heavily stylized supporting characters - he is the archetype of the sardonic detective, although Andes might have a few more quirks than those that are usually associated with this kind of character. Shannon is an excellent actor and he pulls off this side of the character really quite well - he makes for a fairly entertaining presence and he delivers his one-liners in a rather amusing fashion. The writing behind his character is pretty weak and there are times when the screenplay pushes the character's eccentricities way too far, but even in those moments Shannon is still good in the role. He portrays very well Andes' flamboyance without ever feeling too mannered and he often adds some needed energy to the proceeding. The accent he adopts for the role is quite thick but thankfully he pulls it off really well so it never becomes distracting, and actually he manages to sell even his oddest lines thanks to his delivery alone. For a large chunk of the movie, there is nothing to his character othen than his surface and Shannon can't do anything about that, but to his credit he does try to give some weight to a few moments, such as the one in which he tells Tony the cause of death of his wife and daughter, and he makes the interrogation scenes both very entertaining and tense - no one can pull off the creepy, intense stare like he does. He is quite fascinating in his portrayal of his character's own method in his work and his performance occasionally quite compelling even if the role itself is not really worth his effort.

The only scene in which the screenplay gives Bobby a little bit more depth is in the second half of the movie, in which he reveals Tony that he is dying of cancer. Shannon is very moving at showing his character's sadness towards his imminent fate but not quite a desperation - he doesn't fear death, he has sadly accepted it and the things that hurt him the most are his regrets, particularly his relationship with his estranged daughter. Shannon stays fairly low-key throughout the entire scenes but he gives it the needed emotional key and subtly communicates the suffering and plight of this man. Along with the pain, Shannon also brings a certain determination to Bobby as he now has nothing to lose and decides to see justice done before his demise.

In his final scenes I found Shannon to be rather effective at portraying his character's unhinged behavior as he really won't stop in front of anything in order to achieve his goal and there's a raw quality to his performance in those scenes that I certainly appreciated. He has some truly chilling moment in his last scene as he confronts two of the men responsible for the crimes, even if I have to say his exit in the movie is extremely disappointing. He just sort of leaves and it really doesn't feel like a worthy closure neither to the character nor the performance.

In the end, I think that this is an entirely good performance by Michael Shannon even if it is hardly his best. He really makes the most out of his severely underwritten role and even if for most of the time his character is all surface he does a good job at portraying that surface. In the moments in which he is allowed to shine, he truly does. Overall his work is undermined by the movie and the screenplay, but it's still a wholly solid turn from an actor who, with a better writing, would have been amazing in the role. 

3.5/5

9 commenti:

  1. What's your favourite Shannon performance Giuseppe?

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Definitely Take Shelter. A truly amazing performance.

      Elimina
    2. Yeah, that's my favourite as well. Have you seen him in Bug? He and Ashley Judd as brilliant.

      Elimina
    3. I have not seen it yet but I'm really looking forward to see it.

      Elimina
  2. I agree about his closure, it was so unsatisfying.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. It was really disappointing indeed. But really the movie is not very good. The only things I really like about it are Taylor-Johnson, Adams and the Production Design.

      Elimina
  3. Never saw this one. What are your thoughts and ratings for the rest of the cast?

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Adams - 4 (It's a very passive character as half of her screen-time consists of her looking haunted as she reads the novel, but I still like her performance quite a bit. She is a bit miscast in the flashback scenes as a college student but she still portrays quite well Susan' idealism, and then she effectively portrays her growing coldness as her marriage falls apart. In the present scenes, she is very effective at bringing elegance and loneliness to Susan in equal measures and she is quite affecting in the final scene)

      Gyllenhaal - 3 (I loved him on first viewing, now not so much. In the real life scenes, Gyllenhaal is too a bit miscast and even if I found him to be overall okay he does not always manages to pull off the cringeworthy dialogue. In the novel scenes, he is fine at portraying his character's grief but there are moments that feel a little bit off and he's thoroughly overshadowed by Shannon and Taylor-Johnson. It's not a bad performance, but it's rather disappointing considering that Gyllenhaal is an amazing actor)

      Taylor-Johnson - 5 (I really loved his performance and I was rooting for him to get an Oscar nod. Anyway I think he manages to pull off something extremely difficult here: he delivers a very broad performance that often borders on being campy but at the same time there's not a single moment in which I did not find him absolutely menacing. He is extremely effective as he manages to be extremely over-the-top without ever being hammy and makes Ray a truly terrifying and menacing villain. It's an unpredictable and electrifying performance and by far the best thing about the movie)

      Elimina
    2. Hammer - 2 (Extremely bland and forgettable performance)

      Linney - 2 (She might have a couple of decent line deliveries here and there, but otherwise it's a very poor performance. It's a very unnatural portrayal that never feels genuine in any sort of way, and just portrays her character as a sort of Cruella De Vil without any credibility. It's a heavily stylized performance but the thing is that it's also extremely hollow and overcooked)

      Malone, Sheen (They at least try to pull off the satire, they can't but I admire them for it. They're not in the movie enough to leave an impression anyway)

      Riseborough - 2 (Found her way overboard in her single scene)

      Elimina