domenica 15 maggio 2016

Best Actress in a Supporting Role 1955: Peggy Lee in Pete Kelly's Blues

Peggy Lee received her only Oscar nomination for her performance as Rose Hopkins in Pete Kelly's Blues. 


Pete Kelly's Blues is a terrible movie about a jazz cornetist, Pete Kelly, who seeks revenge for the murder of his band's drummer at the hands of a local crime boss. The plot of the movie is hardly anything original but the real problem is that its execution is awful: the dialogues are melodramatic and borderline atrocious, Jack Webb's direction is completely uninspired and atonal and his leading performance is wooden and dull. The other performances aren't that better either: Janet Leigh is extremely annoying in her paper-thin portrayal of the feisty love interest of Kelly and Edmond O'Brien is more a caricature rather than a threatening, menacing presence. Lee Marvin though is quite good in his subtle, nice performance. The cinematography is also good and the movie looks wonderful, but that's about it. 

Peggy Lee plays the role of Rose Hopkins, an alcoholic jazz singer as well as Frank McCarg's (O'Brien) moll. It's a difficult role that features some extremely tricky scenes to play while not having that much screen-time either and before seeing the movie I was actually expecting a very poor performance. Watching the movie, I was extremely surprised: Peggy Lee shows to be a surprisingly talented performer and while her inexperience can be felt throughout some scenes I truly believe that in the hands of a better director and in a better movie her performance could have been absolutely great. Sadly, Lee doesn't get any help from Jack Webb's direction and it's extremely frustrating to see a potentially great performance being hindered by the poor quality of the movie and the utter lack of skill of the director. In the hands of, say, Orson Welles, this performance could have been so much more: unfortunately, we only get glimpses of the performance this could have been but it's still a fine performance that easily stands out as the movie's strongest asset. Her first scenes are actually her best and as soon as she appeared I found myself tolerating the movie a little bit more: Lee does a very good job in making Rose the movie's most sympathetic character and in her voice you can feel the pain, the regret of what her life could have been and the sad memories of her broken dreams. I was extremely surprised by her ability to convey so much with so little and seems to be, along with Lee Marvin, the only cast member who isn't awkwardly dull or painfully hammy: instead, she portrays the role with subtlety and delicacy and her line reading of the line "Don't worry Frank, I can't reach that high anymore" after McCarg smashes her glass on the wall is filled with bitterness and poignant sadness. Her singing scenes are very good as well: of course her voice is beautiful but she also uses those scenes to add a bit of depth to the character - particularly in her execution of the song He needs me she projects wonderfully her character's self-destructive love for a man who treats her like an object.

Her performance unfortunately kind of gets lost in the middle and she has a few extremely difficult scenes that she isn't quite able to handle. The scene in which Rose gets drunk and cannot bring herself to sing is played rather poorly by Peggy Lee who adopts the most stereotypical type of drunk acting. Her line-readings are unconvincing and come off as false, her facial expressions are occasionally odd and her body movements feel overcooked or strangely robotic, as if she wasn't quite sure of what to do. The brief moment in which Rose falls on the stairs after being savagely beaten by McCarg is almost embarrassing because of how forced it feels. And then there is her final scene, in which Kelly goes to visit Rose who has been admitted to an asylum due to having "the brain of a five years old" after her beating: the concept of the scene is actually quite ridiculous but Lee astonishingly manages to make it work. She's actually very moving in her portrayal of Rose's mental state and she does a pretty great job in switching from moments of hopeless confusion to brief, small moments of lucidity. She has some truly heartbreaking line deliveries ("He was mean to my baby" or her last line "I have so many good friends") and her rendition of the childish tune she keeps singing is extremely haunting. Unfortunately, she isn't helped at all by Jack Webb who is dreadfully dull and undercuts slightly the impact of the scene. 

In the end, this is a good performance from Peggy Lee who has some truly great moments in the beginning and towards the end but who is unfortunately hindered by the movie's terrible direction, awful screenplay and also her inability due to her inexperience to handle her drunk scenes. Still, I admire the fact that she manages to rise above the movie's quality and even if under other circumstances her performance could have been better it's still a fine, moving turn. 

3/5

11 commenti:

  1. I'm quite pleased that you liked her (a little). I love her as a singer and as Peg in Lady and the Tramp (which I first saw when I was young (sometime in the very late 90s)). I fell in love with her voice, but never really got to appreciate her until she had long since passed and discovered YouTube. It's a shame she is forgotten, like so many other people who were in Disney movies (such as Ilene Woods).

    As for the movie, I saw the trailer and I can see what you mean by atrocious. Webb is very uninteresting and Leigh is over the top in the scenes shown. And I don't even want to start on the "climatic scene" with the disco like ball that falls.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Regarding the "climatic scene", oh my god that was just cringe-worthy.

      Peggy Lee has such an amazing voice and I really like her voice work in Lady and the Tramp.

      Elimina
    2. I believe the whole scene is on YouTube. I'm tempted to watch it, but I think I will wait until I inevitably see the whole movie.

      Elimina
  2. Bad to know Lee and Leigh are not that good here.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. I know my rating is not very high but considering how awful the movie is and how melodramatic the screenplay is, it's impressive that Lee still manages to leave a positive impact. Her performance is not great but mostly not for faults of her own. I absolutely hate the movie yet I saw it twice just for her, so her performance must be at least good.

      As for Janet Leigh... She's really bad. It's a truly grating presence throughout the movie and even if her character is already poorly written she truly brings nothing to it.

      Elimina
  3. Glad to know that Marvin is good at least, he tends to be whatever the film is (probably the most consistent actor of that period, rarely great but always good at the very least). I'm glad to see she's at least a 3 though, it seems like an interesting performance in a way.

    Regards to your earlier comment about Harris, she definitely deserved a nomination. I thought she handled her scenes with Dean realyl well by not trying to overshadow him in any way, but by generating such a lovely chemistry with him. I'd give her a very strong 4 verging on a 4.5.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Yes Lee Marvin tends to be a pretty consistent actor.

      As for Lee, it is a very interesting performance. As I said, she proves herself to be quite talented and even if she's not good in the drunk scenes I think that a better director could have helped her greatly there. The point is that even her best scenes are undercut by the fact that her co-stars are pretty terrible (she sadly never shares the screen with Marvin) and her role is written as extremely melodramatic. Combine all this with less than twenty minutes of screen-time and you can see how many setbacks she had to overcome. I appreciate her performance because to an extent she really rises above the movie.

      As for Julie Harris, I agree with everything you said including the rating. It's a lovely, simple performance.

      Elimina
  4. Out of curiosity, what are your rating for the rest of the cast?

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. Jack Webb - 1.5 (He's just awkwardly dull in the role and he never once shows any sort of emotion whatsoever. He has a bland, pale screen-presence and he isn't able to carry a scene in any single way. He never makes the viewer invested in the story and gives a performance that couldn't be more uninteresting if it tried)

      Edmond O'Brien - 2 (It's not that he's actively bad but his role is just written as a caricature. On his part he actually does nothing to add any sort of depth to his character and is just a standard and forgettable villain)

      Janet Leigh - 1.5 (I actually like her in general, but here she delivers a very poor performance. She frankly feels uncomfortable in the role and while she should have been feisty and charming she just comes off as grating and strangely lifeless. Her character is written only as a love interest and not much else, but even in this regard she fails as she has no chemistry with Webb)

      Lee Marvin - 3 (He, along with Peggy Lee, is the only redeeming quality of this movie. He doesn't do much but he portrays the role with subtlety and dignity even if all of his scenes are opposite Webb who just sucks the life out of every scene he's in)

      Elimina
  5. I'm going to make my prediction for the category now since I missed my chance on the lineup post. If that's not OK, then just disregard them:
    1. Betsy Blair
    2. Natalie Wood
    3. Jo Van Fleet
    4. Marisa Pavan
    5. Peggy Lee

    On 2013, I am so happy you mentioned Reem Abdullah in the honorable mentions. Wonderful performance in a criminally underseen film.

    RispondiElimina
    Risposte
    1. You can give your predictions before I post my second review so they are valid.

      And as for Abdullah, I found her performance wonderfully realistic and quietly devastating. The more I think about it the more I like it.

      Elimina